Re: Improving isolationtester's data output
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-06-17T03:34:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > Nobody has complained about the removal of --dry-run with 13~. The > second one would cause tests to fail after a minor upgrade for > extensions using isolationtester, but it seems like a good thing to > inform people about anyway. So, okay, both parts are done. Thanks! regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Improve display of query results in isolation tests.
- 4a054069a360 14.0 landed
- e535a8899397 9.6.23 landed
- d7da3ef08989 12.8 landed
- b961bdfe1664 13.4 landed
- b1aa0f228465 11.13 landed
- 0a8929ca0b9e 10.18 landed
-
Detect unused steps in isolation specs and do some cleanup
- 484c81bf7765 9.6.23 landed
- feac82fa8550 10.18 landed
- 8f32299424d9 11.13 landed
- 96f3661e4540 12.8 landed
- 989d23b04bea 13.0 cited
-
Remove dry-run mode from isolationtester
- b7cd5c5b02fa 9.6.23 landed
- 0ed218048932 10.18 landed
- 834cb7269166 11.13 landed
- a8f687927eea 12.8 landed
- 9903338b5ea5 13.0 cited