Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
曾文旌 (义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
From: 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia@taobao.com>, Cai, Le <le.cai@alibaba-inc.com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong.xsc@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: 2020-01-28T16:01:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.
- 30aaab26e521 14.0 cited
-
Remove temporary files after backend crash
- cd91de0d1795 14.0 cited
-
Fix comment in indexing.c
- 9fd2952cf492 14.0 cited
-
Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.
- 6919b7e32947 9.3.0 cited
> 2020年1月24日 上午4:47,Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> 写道: > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:51 PM Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I proposed just ignoring those new indexes because it seems much simpler >> than alternative solutions that I can think of, and it's not like those >> other solutions don't have other issues. > > +1. I complete the implementation of this feature. When a session x create an index idx_a on GTT A then For session x, idx_a is valid when after create index. For session y, before session x create index done, GTT A has some data, then index_a is invalid. For session z, before session x create index done, GTT A has no data, then index_a is valid. > >> For example, I've looked at the "on demand" building as implemented in >> global_private_temp-8.patch, I kinda doubt adding a bunch of index build >> calls into various places in index code seems somewht suspicious. > > +1. I can't imagine that's a safe or sane thing to do. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company Opinion by Pavel + rel->rd_islocaltemp = true; <<<<<<< if this is valid, then the name of field "rd_islocaltemp" is not probably best I renamed rd_islocaltemp Opinion by Konstantin Knizhnik 1 Fixed comments 2 Fixed assertion Please help me review. Wenjing