Re: git: uh-oh

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 15:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>>> Somebody could use "git filter-branch" to make this change after the
>>> conversion, but I can't estimate how much work it would be.
>> 
>> The conversion is already far better than I expected it would be when
>> we were first discussing this switch, so my inclination is to just live
>> with this one wart.

> You're saying you don't "require" a fix on the latest issue here? Or
> should we spend some time trying to figure out if we can fix it with
> git-filter-branch?

If you want to try, and it doesn't take much time, go for it.  I was
just saying I wouldn't complain if we decide to live with it as-is.

			regards, tom lane