Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2026-Feb-23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Looking at this function in pgoutput_repack.c:
>
> > +/* Store concurrent data change. */
> > +static void
> > +store_change(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx, ConcurrentChangeKind kind,
> > + HeapTuple tuple)
> > +{
>
> [...] we have this:
>
> > + size = VARHDRSZ + SizeOfConcurrentChange;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * ReorderBufferCommit() stores the TOAST chunks in its private memory
> > + * context and frees them after having called apply_change(). Therefore
> > + * we need flat copy (including TOAST) that we eventually copy into the
> > + * memory context which is available to decode_concurrent_changes().
> > + */
> > + if (HeapTupleHasExternal(tuple))
> > + {
> > + /*
> > + * toast_flatten_tuple_to_datum() might be more convenient but we
> > + * don't want the decompression it does.
> > + */
> > + tuple = toast_flatten_tuple(tuple, dstate->tupdesc);
> > + flattened = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + size += tuple->t_len;
> > + if (size >= MaxAllocSize)
> > + elog(ERROR, "Change is too big.");
> > +
> > + /* Construct the change. */
> > + change_raw = (char *) palloc0(size);
> > + SET_VARSIZE(change_raw, size);
In 0005 ("Use background worker to do logical decoding"), the function is a
bit simpler because here the decoding worker uses temporary file to send the
data to the REPACKing backend, rather than tuplestore. sharedtuplestore.h
would also work but I think we do not need its functionality, and AFAICS it
always writes the data into a file anyway (i.e. it does not use memory even if
the amount of data is small).
(Perhaps 0004 should use the file too, in case 0005 does not make it into PG
19.)
> I wonder if this isn't problematic with large tuples. If a row has some
> very wide columns, each of which individually is less than 1 GB, then it
> might happen that the sum of their sizes exceeds 1 GB, causing palloc()
> to complain and abort the whole repack operation. This wouldn't be very
> nice, so I think we need to address it somehow.
I agree.
> I think we need some new APIs to avoid all this copying. It appears
> that it all starts with reorderbuffer doing something unhelpful with the
> memory context of the TOAST chunks. Maybe we should address this by
> "fixing" reorderbuffer so that it doesn't do this, instead of playing so
> many games to cope.
What I see is that reorderbuffer.c collects the TOAST pointers
(ReorderBufferToastAppendChunk) and then, before passing the tuple to the
output plugin, it copies the TOAST chunks referenced by the tuple to memory
and replaces the "on-disk" TOAST pointers in the tuple with "external
indirect" ones, pointing to the in-memory TOAST chunks
(ReorderBufferToastReplace).
For REPACK, I suggest a variant of toast_flatten_tuple() that writes the
output to a file, and a corresponding function that reads it while allocating
separate chunks of memory for the individual TOASTed attributes - the restored
tuple would reference the chunks using the "external indirect" TOAST pointers,
as if it had been processed by ReorderBufferToastReplace(). Does that make
sense to you?
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow old WAL recycling during REPACK CONCURRENTLY
- 45b02984e2fa 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation
- 38470c2c1ea7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unnecessary signal handler change
- 5d48d3b14e0e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) error messages some more
- 378dffaf8c80 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert "Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific"
- 01a80f062146 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) test out of stock regression tests
- 4b2aa4b39cba 19 (unreleased) landed
-
REPACK: do not require REPLICATION or LOGIN
- 5dbb63fc82b7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add missing initialization
- 05c401d5786a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify declaration of memcpy target
- 2cff363715ef 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Reserve replication slots specifically for REPACK
- e76d8c749c31 19 (unreleased) landed
-
doc: Add an example of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)
- 8fb95a8ab6e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific
- 0d3dba38c777 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Avoid different-size pointer-to-integer cast
- a3b069ef90bd 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix valgrind failure
- 5bcc3fbd196c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK
- 28d534e2ae0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Rename cluster.c to repack.c (and corresponding .h)
- c0b53ec06309 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow index_create to suppress index_build progress reporting
- caec9d9fadf1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make index_concurrently_create_copy more general
- 33bf7318f94c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Document the 'command' column of pg_stat_progress_repack
- a630ac5c2016 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce the REPACK command
- ac58465e0618 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.
- 67c20979ce72 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Split vacuumdb to create vacuuming.c/h
- c4067383cb2c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.
- 08e6344fd642 17.0 cited
-
Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance
- 042b584c7f7d 14.4 cited
-
VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY
- d9d076222f5b 14.0 cited