Re: FunctionCallN improvement.

a_ogawa <a_ogawa@hi-ho.ne.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Based on this I think we ought to go with the "unrolled" approach,

> I agree. The unrolled approach is a good result in most environments. 

I have committed changes along this line in HEAD and 8_0 branches.

> First of all, this macro will be applied only to fmgr.c, but I think 
> we better define it in fmgr.h. 

For the moment I just put it in fmgr.c to have a minimally invasive
patch.  We can make it globally available if there's evidence it's
needed elsewhere.

			regards, tom lane