Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-23T17:19:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I spent some time studying this patch this morning. As far as I can > see, 0001 is a relatively faithful implementation of the design Tom > proposed back in early 2019. I think it would be nice to either get > this committed or else decide that we don't want it and what we're > going to try to do instead, Yeah, it's on my to-do list for this CF, but I expect it's going to take some concentrated study and other things keep intruding :-(. All of your comments/questions seem reasonable; thanks for taking a look. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Rework planning and execution of UPDATE and DELETE.
- 86dc90056dfd 14.0 landed
-
Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection.
- b8d7f053c5c2 10.0 cited