Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>

From: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-11-16T18:12:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Nov 16, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 10:58 -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
>> It is unclear .....
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> What if we just say that OWNER TO must be done by a superuser, changing
> from one superuser to another, just like today? That would preserve
> backwards compatibility, but people with non-superuser subscriptions
> would need to drop/recreate them.

The paragraph I wrote on 11/01 and you are responding to is no longer relevant.  The patch submission on 11/03 tackled the problem.  Have you had a chance to take a look at the new design?

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix possible crash in tablesync worker.

  2. Display 'password_required' option for \dRs+ command.

  3. Restart the apply worker if the 'password_required' option is changed.

  4. Fix possible logical replication crash.

  5. Add new predefined role pg_create_subscription.

  6. Expand AclMode to 64 bits

  7. More cleanup of a2ab9c06ea.

  8. Respect permissions within logical replication.

  9. Improve table locking behavior in the face of current DDL.