Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> On 11/05/2021 21:58, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +	# for backwards compatibility, interpret "serial" as parallel tests

> This comment isn't great, IMHO. How about:

> # for backwards comopatibility, "serial" runs the tests in
> # parallel_schedule one by one.

Yeah, and on closer inspection, the code is wrong too :-(.
I'd confused --max-concurrent-tests with --max-connections,
but they're different.

Also, I did take a look at pg_regress.c, and confirmed my
fear that getting it to duplicate the serial output style
would be kind of messy.

			regards, tom lane