Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-10-06T11:11:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Silence compiler warning introduced in 1edb3b491b

On 04.10.23 20:30, Dave Cramer wrote:
>     We need to
>     figure out what is the right way to globally identify types, like
>     either
>     by fully-qualified name, by base name, some combination, how does it
>     work with extensions, or do we need a new mechanism like UUIDs.  I
>     think
>     that is something we need to work out, no matter which protocol
>     mechanism we end up using.
> 
> 
> So how is this different than the GUC that I proposed ?

The last patch I see from you in this thread uses OIDs, which I have 
argued is not the right solution.