Re: Separate GUC for replication origins
Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
From: "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
To: "Amit Kapila" <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
"Peter Eisentraut" <peter@eisentraut.org>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-02-06T00:39:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025, at 1:56 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 8:17 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
> >
> > Under reflection, an accurate name is max_replication_origin_session_setup. A
> > counter argument is that it is a long name (top-5 length).
> >
> > postgres=# select n, length(n) from (values('max_replication_origins'),
> > ('max_tracked_replication_origins'),('max_replication_origin_states'),
> > ('max_replication_origin_session_setup')) as gucs(n);
> > n | length
> > --------------------------------------+--------
> > max_replication_origins | 23
> > max_tracked_replication_origins | 31
> > max_replication_origin_states | 29
> > max_replication_origin_session_setup | 36
> > (4 rows)
> >
>
> The other possibility is max_replication_origin_sessions.
Looks reasonable to me.
Opinions?
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
Commits
-
Add GUC option to control maximum active replication origins.
- 04ff636cbce4 18.0 landed
-
Better document logical replication parameters
- a8500750ca0a 16.0 cited
-
Introduce replication progress tracking infrastructure.
- 5aa2350426c4 9.5.0 cited