Re: remaining sql/json patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
SQL/JSON: Various improvements to SQL/JSON query function docs
- ce416fadb4b6 17.0 landed
- 42de72fa7b80 18.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON: Fix some obsolete comments.
- 290a6d800d90 17.0 landed
- 7768b6569de9 16.4 landed
- 3a8a1f3254b2 18.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON: Fix issues with DEFAULT .. ON ERROR / EMPTY
- c0fc0751862d 17.0 landed
-
JSON_TABLE: Add support for NESTED paths and columns
- bb766cde63b4 17.0 landed
-
Fix JsonExpr deparsing to emit QUOTES and WRAPPER correctly
- f6a2529920cf 17.0 landed
-
Fix typo introduced in 6185c9737
- 2f6e78b0619a 17.0 landed
-
Add basic JSON_TABLE() functionality
- de3600452b61 17.0 landed
-
Avoid splitting errmsg string to span multiple lines
- 085e759e9da7 17.0 landed
-
Add SQL/JSON query functions
- 6185c9737cf4 17.0 landed
-
Implement various jsonpath methods
- 66ea94e8e606 17.0 cited
-
Add soft error handling to some expression nodes
- aaaf9449ec6b 17.0 landed
- 7fbc75b26ed8 17.0 landed
-
Adjust populate_record_field() to handle errors softly
- 1edb3b491bee 17.0 landed
-
Refactor code used by jsonpath executor to fetch variables
- faa2b953ba3b 17.0 landed
-
Test EXPLAIN (FORMAT JSON) ... XMLTABLE
- 752533d40fd5 17.0 landed
-
Simplify productions for FORMAT JSON [ ENCODING name ]
- d3fe6e90bab5 17.0 landed
-
Add trailing commas to enum definitions
- 611806cd726f 17.0 cited
-
doc: add missing <returnvalue> and whitespace
- e055b6be7ebb 17.0 landed
-
Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
- 03734a7fed7d 17.0 landed
-
Rename a nonterminal used in SQL/JSON grammar
- 254ac5a7c31f 17.0 landed
-
Some refactoring to export json(b) conversion functions
- b22391a2ff7b 17.0 landed
-
Don't include CaseTestExpr in JsonValueExpr.formatted_expr
- 66a9003e2e3e 16.0 landed
- b6e1157e7d33 17.0 landed
-
Code review for commit b6e1157e7d
- 7c7412cae3ea 17.0 landed
-
Pass constructName to transformJsonValueExpr()
- 7825a1b01e40 16.0 landed
- 785480c9533d 17.0 landed
-
Unify JSON categorize type API and export for external use
- 3c152a27b063 17.0 landed
-
Make some indentation in gram.y consistent
- 5edf438eeb00 17.0 landed
- 01f1f789df56 16.0 landed
-
Allow most keywords to be used as column labels without requiring AS.
- 06a7c3154f5b 14.0 cited
-
Reduce size of backend scanner's tables.
- 7f380c59f800 13.0 cited
-
Use perfect hashing, instead of binary search, for keyword lookup.
- c64d0cd5ce24 12.0 cited
On 2023-11-28 Tu 00:10, John Naylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 8:57 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> Interesting. But inferring a speed effect from such changes is >> difficult. I don't have a good idea about measuring parser speed, but a >> tool to do that would be useful. Amit has made a start on such >> measurements, but it's only a start. I'd prefer to have evidence rather >> than speculation. > Tom shared this test a while back, and that's the one I've used in the > past. The downside for a micro-benchmark like that is that it can > monopolize the CPU cache. Cache misses in real world queries are > likely much more dominant. > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14616.1558560331@sss.pgh.pa.us Cool, I took this and ran with it a bit. (See attached) Here are comparative timings for 1000 iterations parsing most of the information_schema.sql, all the way back to 9.3: ==== REL9_3_STABLE ==== Time: 3998.701 ms ==== REL9_4_STABLE ==== Time: 3987.596 ms ==== REL9_5_STABLE ==== Time: 4129.049 ms ==== REL9_6_STABLE ==== Time: 4145.777 ms ==== REL_10_STABLE ==== Time: 4140.927 ms (00:04.141) ==== REL_11_STABLE ==== Time: 4145.078 ms (00:04.145) ==== REL_12_STABLE ==== Time: 3528.625 ms (00:03.529) ==== REL_13_STABLE ==== Time: 3356.067 ms (00:03.356) ==== REL_14_STABLE ==== Time: 3401.406 ms (00:03.401) ==== REL_15_STABLE ==== Time: 3372.491 ms (00:03.372) ==== REL_16_STABLE ==== Time: 1654.056 ms (00:01.654) ==== HEAD ==== Time: 1614.949 ms (00:01.615) This is fairly repeatable. The first good news is that the parser is pretty fast. Even 4ms to parse almost all the information schema setup is pretty good. The second piece of good news is that recent modifications have vastly improved the speed. So even if the changes from the SQL/JSON patches eat up a bit of that gain, I think we're in good shape. In a few days I'll re-run the test with the SQL/JSON patches applied. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com