Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

>> Fair enough.
> 
> So, I tried to work up a patch for this, but I'm actually a bit
> confused about what needs to be done here.  I'll attach what I've got
> so far as a starting point for discussion.

Looks reasonable, if verbose. (Yes, the extension design currently requires that). What about doc updates?

Best,

David