Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?
Florian G. Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
From: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-11-12T22:09:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix copyright notices, other minor editing in new range-types code.
- f1585362856d 9.2.0 cited
-
Redesign the plancache mechanism for more flexibility and efficiency.
- e6faf910d750 9.2.0 cited
On Nov11, 2011, at 19:17 , Tom Lane wrote: > But frankly I do not like any of these proposals. Making fundamental > changes in long-established semantics in the name of squeezing out a few > cycles is the wrong way to design software. Hm, then maybe this is one of the things to put onto the next protocol version todo list? best regards, Florian Pflug