Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>
Cc: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-07-08T18:07:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Force LC_NUMERIC to C while running TAP tests.
- f25792c541e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Minor tweaks for pg_test_timing.
- 9dcc7641444f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Change pg_test_timing to measure in nanoseconds not microseconds.
- 0b096e379e6f 19 (unreleased) landed
BTW, returning to the original topic of this thread:
The new exact-delays table from pg_test_timing is really quite
informative. For example, on my M4 Macbook:
Observed timing durations up to 99.9900%:
ns % of total running % count
0 62.2124 62.2124 118127987
41 12.5826 74.7951 23891661
42 25.1653 99.9604 47783489
83 0.0194 99.9797 36744
84 0.0096 99.9893 18193
125 0.0020 99.9913 3784
...
31042 0.0000 100.0000 1
The fact that the clock tick is about 40ns is extremely
obvious in this presentation.
Even more interesting is what I got from an ancient PPC Macbook
(mamba's host, running NetBSD):
Testing timing overhead for 3 seconds.
Per loop time including overhead: 731.26 ns
...
Observed timing durations up to 99.9900%:
ns % of total running % count
705 39.9162 39.9162 1637570
706 17.6040 57.5203 722208
759 18.6797 76.2000 766337
760 23.7851 99.9851 975787
813 0.0002 99.9853 9
814 0.0004 99.9857 17
868 0.0001 99.9858 4
922 0.0001 99.9859 3
...
564950 0.0000 100.0000 1
I had previously reported that that machine had microsecond
timing precision, but this shows that the real problem is that
it takes most of a microsecond to go 'round the timing loop.
It seems clear that the system clock ticks about every 50ns,
even on this decades-old hardware.
regards, tom lane