Re: proposal: schema variables

Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI.DUVAL@cheops.fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-22T08:23:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Move WAL sequence code into its own file

  2. Add ExplainState argument to pg_plan_query() and planner().

  3. Don't include access/htup_details.h in executor/tuptable.h

  4. Refactor to avoid code duplication in transformPLAssignStmt.

  5. Avoid including commands/dbcommands.h in so many places

  6. Restrict psql meta-commands in plain-text dumps.

  7. Split func.sgml into more manageable pieces

  8. Fix squashing algorithm for query texts

  9. EXPLAIN: Always use two fractional digits for row counts.

  10. Preliminary refactoring of plpgsql expression construction.

  11. plpgsql: pure parser and reentrant scanner

  12. Add some sanity checks in executor for query ID reporting

  13. Fix misleading error message context

  14. Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.

Thanks for the updated patch and the fixes!

On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 08:37 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_restore.sgml
> > > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_restore.sgml
> > 
> > > +     <varlistentry>
> > > +      <term><option>-A <replaceable class="parameter">schema_variable</replaceable></option></term>
> > > +      <term><option>--variable=<replaceable class="parameter">schema_variable</replaceable></option></term>
> > > +      <listitem>
> > > +       <para>
> > > +        Restore a named schema variable only.  Multiple schema variables may be specified with
> > > +        multiple <option>-A</option> switches.
> > > +       </para>
> > > +      </listitem>
> > > +     </varlistentry>
> > 
> > Do we need that?  We have no such option for functions and other non-relations.
> 
> It is designed to be consistent with others. pg_restore supports functions -P, triggers -T 
> > 
> > And if we really want such an option for "pg_restore", why not for "pg_dump"?
> > 
> 
> I have no strong opinion about it, I think so it is consistent with other non-relations, but it is not important.
> 
> I moved this feature to a separate patch. It can be committed optionaly or later.
> 
> pg_restore has options -P, -T, and pg_dump does not have these options. These options (functionality) can
> be implemented in pg_dump too, but unfortunately -T is used for different purposes (exclude table).

Ah!  I didn't realize that -P and -T are the same.  So no objections, although I'm
not sure if anyone will ever want to restore a single variable from a backup.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe