Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 31 May 2012 13:16, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Frankly, I think this whole thing should be pushed to 9.3.

> What matters is that we have a patch that provides a massive
> performance gain in write performance in just a few lines of code, and
> that should be committed to 9.2.

I agree with Robert on this.  This patch hasn't had *nearly* enough
testing to justify cramming it into 9.2 at this point.  AFAIK the
claim of "massive performance gain" is based on a single test case run
by a single person, which doesn't even give me any confidence that it
doesn't break anything, much less that it's a win across the board.

If we want to finish the beta cycle in a reasonable time period and get
back to actual development, we have to refrain from adding more
possibly-destabilizing development work to 9.2.  And that is what
this is.

Add it to the upcoming CF, please.

			regards, tom lane