Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM

> On 16 Aug 2022, at 13:40, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 5:06 PM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:

>> I went with sigexit_handler since pg_recvlogical has also a
>> sighup_handler and "sig_handler" would be confusing there.
> 
> Can we move these signal handlers to streamutil.h/.c so that both
> pg_receivewal and pg_recvlogical can make use of it avoiding duplicate
> code?

In general that's a good idea, but they are so trivial that I don't really see
much point in doing that in this particular case.

--
Daniel Gustafsson		https://vmware.com/