Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
Julian Markwort <julian.markwort@uni-muenster.de>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Valery Popov <v.popov@postgrespro.ru>
Date: 2016-07-21T16:59:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 7/21/16 12:19 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >>> People have, in the past, expressed concerns about linking in >>> pgcrypto. Apparently, in some countries, it's a legal problem. >> >> Do you have any references? I don't see that as a problem. > > I don't have a link to previous discussion handy, but I definitely > recall that it's been discussed. I don't think that would mean that > libpgcrypto couldn't depend on libpgcommon, but the reverse direction > would make libpgcrypto essentially mandatory which I don't think is a > direction we want to go for both technical and legal reasons. I searched a few different ways and finally came up with this post from Tom: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11392.1389991321@sss.pgh.pa.us It's the only thing I could find, but thought it might jog something loose for somebody else. I know that export controls have been an issue for crypto in the past but have no idea what the current state of that is. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
Commits
-
Support SCRAM-SHA-256 authentication (RFC 5802 and 7677).
- 818fd4a67d61 10.0 landed
-
Refactor SHA2 functions and move them to src/common/.
- 273c458a2b3a 10.0 landed
-
Replace isMD5() with a more future-proof way to check if pw is encrypted.
- dbd69118c05d 10.0 landed
-
Remove bogus notice that older clients might not work with MD5 passwords.
- 7e3ae5455948 9.2.20 landed
- 470af1f41c8b 9.3.16 landed
- ada2cdb61015 9.4.11 landed
- 65a7f190b253 9.5.6 landed
- 7546c135dc30 9.6.2 landed
- 31c54096a18f 10.0 landed
-
Refactor the code for verifying user's password.
- e7f051b8f9a6 10.0 landed
-
Replace PostmasterRandom() with a stronger source, second attempt.
- fe0a0b5993df 10.0 landed
-
Remove support for (insecure) crypt authentication.
- 53a5026b5cb3 8.4.0 cited