Horton

Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken

Gavin Flower <gavinflower@archidevsys.co.nz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-06-20T05:35:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 20/06/18 16:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 01:32:58PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Just a minor nit in the last sentence:
>>
>> "have to be from" -> "must be from / must belong to"
> I think that both have the same meaning, but I am no native speaker so I
> may be missing a nuance of some kind.
> --
> Michael

I am a native English speaker, and I was born in England.

In this context, "have to be from", "must be from", and "must belong to" 
are all logically equivalent.  I have a very slight preference for "must 
be from".


Cheers,
Gavin

Commits

  1. Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees