Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-07-19T21:17:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-docs
On Sat, 2020-07-18 at 21:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > > What is your opinion about pessimizing the HashAgg disk costs (not > > affecting HashAgg plans expected to stay in memory)? Tomas Vondra > > presented some evidence that Sort had some better IO patterns in > > some > > cases that weren't easily reflected in a principled way in the cost > > model. > > Hm, was that in some other thread? I didn't find any such info > in a quick look through this one. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2df2e0728d48f498b9d6954b5f9080a34535c385.camel%40j-davis.com Regards, Jeff Davis
Commits
-
Add hash_mem_multiplier GUC.
- d6c08e29e7bc 14.0 landed
- 78530c8e7a5a 13.0 landed
-
HashAgg: use better cardinality estimate for recursive spilling.
- 3a232a3183d5 13.0 landed
- 9878b643f37b 14.0 landed
-
Remove hashagg_avoid_disk_plan GUC.
- bcbf9446a298 14.0 landed
- 5a6cc6ffa914 13.0 landed
-
Doc fixup for hashagg_avoid_disk_plan GUC.
- d33f33539d7f 13.0 landed
- 7ce461560159 14.0 landed
-
Rework HashAgg GUCs.
- 13e0fa7ae50c 13.0 landed
- 92c58fd94801 14.0 landed
-
Disk-based Hash Aggregation.
- 1f39bce02154 13.0 cited
-
Implement partition-wise grouping/aggregation.
- e2f1eb0ee30d 11.0 cited
-
Defer creation of partially-grouped relation until it's needed.
- 4f15e5d09de2 11.0 cited