Re: [CLOBBER_CACHE]Server crashed with segfault 11 while executing clusterdb
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
Neha Sharma <neha.sharma@enterprisedb.com>,
Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-23T15:29:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: >> One bisect later, the winner is: >> commit: 3d351d916b20534f973eda760cde17d96545d4c4 >> author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> >> date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:21:51 -0400 >> Redefine pg_class.reltuples to be -1 before the first VACUUM or ANALYZE. > I think that's an artifact. That commit didn't touch anything related to > relation opening or closing. What it could have done, though, is change > CLUSTER's behavior on this empty table from use-an-index to use-a-seqscan, > thus causing us to follow the buggy code path where before we didn't. On closer inspection, I believe the true culprit is c6b92041d, which did this: */ if (RelationNeedsWAL(state->rs_new_rel)) - heap_sync(state->rs_new_rel); + smgrimmedsync(state->rs_new_rel->rd_smgr, MAIN_FORKNUM); logical_end_heap_rewrite(state); heap_sync was careful about opening rd_smgr, the new code not so much. I read the rest of that commit and didn't see any other equivalent bugs, but I might've missed something. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Replace RelationOpenSmgr() with RelationGetSmgr().
- e21856fd652a 12.14 landed
- d4acf2eb94f3 11.19 landed
- 9a299cf7c21f 13.10 landed
- 32d5a4974c81 14.7 landed
- f10f0ae420ee 15.0 landed
-
Avoid possible crash while finishing up a heap rewrite.
- d4791ac35cb1 13.3 landed
- 9d523119fd38 14.0 landed
-
Redefine pg_class.reltuples to be -1 before the first VACUUM or ANALYZE.
- 3d351d916b20 14.0 cited