Horton

Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>, <josh@agliodbs.com>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2007-10-23T17:47:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:

> I know I just love it when a customer breaks something and I ask what
> changed and it is 56 different things ;)
>
> My question is.. with a checkpoint every 2 months, would it make it
> very easy to release every 6 (or 4 or 3 or 9) months? I am not saying
> we "have" to but it certainly opens up the possibility to the argument
> I made. 

We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews
actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% complete.
I think that would be a good thing but I don't think everyone else agrees.
Also, not all reviewers are committers.


-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com