Re: Extended customizing, SQL functions,
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-05-29T14:13:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
pgsql@mohawksoft.com writes: > Having internal PostgreSQL variables that are not present on disk, or > maybe, variables that are mirrored on disk may be good. I don't think there's anything wrong with your idea, and there are numerous good solutions that implement it already. But what makes you think this belongs in Postgres? There are plenty of memory and disk based shared databases that are non-transactional and non-relational and meant for storing just this kind of non-relational data. Some are much faster than postgres for simple non-concurrent one-record lookups and updates like this. Use the right tool for the job. Don't try to make one tool do everything, especially something that's anathema to its basic design. -- greg