Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM

Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>

From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ang Chin Han <angch@bytecraft.com.my>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-11-10T19:10:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Another idea --- if fsync() is slow because it can't find the dirty
> buffers, use write() to write the buffers, copy the buffer to local
> memory, mark it as clean, then open the file with O_SYNC and write
> it again.

Yuck.

Do we have any idea how many kernels are out there that implement
fsync() as poorly as HPUX apparently does? I'm just wondering if we're
contemplating spending a whole lot of effort to work around a bug that
is only present on an (old?) version of HPUX. Do typical BSD derived
kernels exhibit this behavior? What about Linux? Solaris?

-Neil