Horton

Re: Standalone synchronous master

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

View thread
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Alexander Björnhagen <alex.bjornhagen@gmail.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-12-26T15:05:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> If you don't care about the absolute guarantee of data, why not just
> use async replication? It's still going to replicate the data over to
> the client as quickly as it can - which in the end is the same level
> of guarantee that you get with this switch set, isn't it?

Isn't that equivalent to setting synchronous_standby_names to '' and
reloading the server?

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support