Horton

Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

View thread
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-12-16T16:53:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Fix copyright notices, other minor editing in new range-types code.

  2. Redesign the plancache mechanism for more flexibility and efficiency.

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I thought about adjusting it, but I didn't see what it made sense to
> adjust it to.  It still is the parameter used for parameter I/O and
> parsing/planning, so the existing text isn't wrong.  It will possibly
> also get reused for execution, but the previous statement has a
> lengthy comment on that, so it didn't seem worth recapitulating here.

Ah yes, the previous comment is not far away, so it's easy to read it
that way.  Agreed.

> Actually, I did, but the change was in the second patch file attached
> to the same email, which maybe you missed?  Combined patch attached.

Oops, I missed it, yes.  Looks good to me.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support