Re: Two constraints with the same name not always allowed

Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
To: André Hänsel <andre@webkr.de>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-09-02T13:22:56Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
>>>>> "André" == André Hänsel <andre@webkr.de> writes:

 André> Case 2:

 André> CREATE TABLE t(c integer);
 André> ALTER TABLE t ADD CONSTRAINT foo CHECK(c > 1);
 André> ALTER TABLE t ADD CONSTRAINT foo UNIQUE(c);

 André>  -> Creates two constraints, both called "foo".

I'd call _that_ a bug, myself - having two constraints on a table with
the same name potentially messes up a lot of automated maintenance
operations.

 André> In cases where two constraints with the same name are created,
 André> an "ALTER TABLE t DROP CONSTRAINT ..." drops the UNIQUE first.
 André> Issuing the ALTER TABLE a second time then drops the CHECK.

I think that's purely an artifact of what order an index scan on
pg_constraint_conrelid_index finds the constraints.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


Commits

  1. Fully enforce uniqueness of constraint names.