Horton

Re: TOAST usage setting

Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2007-05-31T08:49:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

> shared_buffers again was 32MB so all the data was in memory.

The case where all the data is in memory is simply not interesting. The cost
of TOAST is the random access seeks it causes. You seem to be intentionally
avoiding testing the precise thing we're interested in.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com