Re: XMLNAMESPACES (was Re: Clarification of nodeToString() use cases)

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

 Tom> The change the attached patch makes is to represent a DEFAULT
 Tom> namespace as a NULL list entry, rather than a T_String Value node
 Tom> containing a null. This approach does work for all backend/nodes/
 Tom> operations, but it could be argued that it's still a crash hazard
 Tom> for unsuspecting code. We could do something else, like use a
 Tom> T_Null Value to represent DEFAULT, but I'm doubtful that that's
 Tom> really much better. A NULL entry has the advantage (or at least
 Tom> I'd consider it one) of being a certain crash rather than a
 Tom> probabilistic crash for any uncorrected code accessing the list
 Tom> item. Thoughts?

Seems reasonable to me.

 Tom> +	    Value    *ns_node = (Value *) lfirst(lc2);

lfirst_node(Value, lc2)  maybe?

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)