Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
>> Stop me if I'm all wrong already, but I though we said that we should
>> handle this case by decoupling what we can send to the standby and what
>> it can apply.
>
> What's the point of that?  It won't make the standby apply any faster.

True, but it allows to send the WAL content before to ack its fsync.

Regards.
-- 
dim