Re: BUG #15378: SP-GIST memory context screwup?
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
From: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Date: 2018-09-11T03:13:21Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
[CCing Teodor as committer of ccd6eb49a]
>>>>> "PG" == PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
PG> I found this while analyzing a report from IRC that initially
PG> looked like a PostGIS bug, but which I now think is breakage in
PG> spgist:
PG> spgrescan starts out by doing
PG> MemoryContextReset(so->traversalCxt);
PG> then later it calls resetSpGistScanOpaque(so);
PG> which calls freeScanStack(so)
PG> which calls freeScanStackEntry(so)
PG> which does:
PG> if (stackEntry->traversalValue)
PG> pfree(stackEntry->traversalValue);
PG> But stackEntry->traversalValue, if not NULL, is supposed to have
PG> been allocated in so->traversalCxt, and so it's already gone.
[...]
PG> Unfortunately I don't think this can be demonstrated with the
PG> built-in spgist opclasses, which don't allocate traversalValues.
Turns out I was looking in the wrong place, and in fact we can reproduce
this easily (at least on an assert build):
create table boxes (b box);
insert into boxes
select box(point(i,j),point(i+s,j+s))
from generate_series(1,100,5) i,
generate_series(1,100,5) j,
generate_series(1,10) s;
create index on boxes using spgist (b);
select *
from (values (box(point(5,5),point(8,8))),(box(point(2,2),point(12,12)))) v(b)
cross join lateral (select * from boxes where boxes.b && v.b limit 1) pt;
So this logic was added in ccd6eb49a and was wrong from the start.
Testing suggests that removing the offending pfree does indeed fix the
issue; any objections?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
Commits
-
Repair double-free in SP-GIST rescan (bug #15378)
- 84a3a1e55c86 9.6.11 landed
- c02b56869439 10.6 landed
- e331d6712f02 11.0 landed
- 500d49794f1f 12.0 landed