Re: BUG #15378: SP-GIST memory context screwup?

Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Date: 2018-09-11T03:13:21Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
[CCing Teodor as committer of ccd6eb49a]

>>>>> "PG" == PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:

 PG> I found this while analyzing a report from IRC that initially
 PG> looked like a PostGIS bug, but which I now think is breakage in
 PG> spgist:

 PG> spgrescan starts out by doing
 PG>     MemoryContextReset(so->traversalCxt);

 PG> then later it calls resetSpGistScanOpaque(so);
 PG> which calls freeScanStack(so)
 PG> which calls freeScanStackEntry(so)
 PG> which does:

 PG>     if (stackEntry->traversalValue)
 PG>         pfree(stackEntry->traversalValue);

 PG> But stackEntry->traversalValue, if not NULL, is supposed to have
 PG> been allocated in so->traversalCxt, and so it's already gone.
 [...]
 PG> Unfortunately I don't think this can be demonstrated with the
 PG> built-in spgist opclasses, which don't allocate traversalValues.

Turns out I was looking in the wrong place, and in fact we can reproduce
this easily (at least on an assert build):

create table boxes (b box);
insert into boxes
  select box(point(i,j),point(i+s,j+s))
    from generate_series(1,100,5) i,
         generate_series(1,100,5) j,
         generate_series(1,10) s;
create index on boxes using spgist (b);
select *
  from (values (box(point(5,5),point(8,8))),(box(point(2,2),point(12,12)))) v(b)
       cross join lateral (select * from boxes where boxes.b && v.b limit 1) pt;

So this logic was added in ccd6eb49a and was wrong from the start.
Testing suggests that removing the offending pfree does indeed fix the
issue; any objections?

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


Commits

  1. Repair double-free in SP-GIST rescan (bug #15378)