Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove table_scan_analyze_next_tuple unneeded parameter OldestXmin
- 284925508ae6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify visibility check in heap_page_would_be_all_visible()
- 3efe58febc3c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Eliminate use of cached VM value in lazy_scan_prune()
- 648a7e28d7c2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Combine visibilitymap_set() cases in lazy_scan_prune()
- 21796c267d0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix const qualification in prune_freeze_setup()
- 4877391ce894 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify vacuum visibility assertion
- bd298f54a0d6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split heap_page_prune_and_freeze() into helpers
- e135e044572e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Assert that cutoffs are provided if freezing will be attempted
- cd38b7e77315 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split PruneFreezeParams initializers to one field per line
- 1e14edcea5e1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor heap_page_prune_and_freeze() parameters into a struct
- 1937ed70621e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make heap_page_is_all_visible independent of LVRelState
- 3e4705484e0c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Inline TransactionIdFollows/Precedes[OrEquals]()
- 43b05b38ea4d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add helper for freeze determination to heap_page_prune_and_freeze
- c8dd6542bae4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC after xl_heap_prune change
- 4a8fb58671d3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Correct prune WAL record opcode name in comment
- ae8ea7278c16 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes when vacuum discovers VM corruption
- 8ec97e78a771 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused xl_heap_prune member, reason
- 4b5f206de2bb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unneeded VM pin from VM replay
- 3399c265543e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add assert and log message to visibilitymap_set
- e3d5ddb7ca91 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes to some corruption log messages
- fd6ec93bf890 13.0 cited
> On 14 Jul 2025, at 00:15, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Also, I'd prefer "page is not marked all-visible but visibility map bit is set in relation" to emit XX001 for monitoring reasons, but again, this is small note, while I need a broader picture. > > Could you clarify what you mean by this? Are you talking about the > string representation of the visibility map bits in the WAL record > representations in heapdesc.c? This might be a bit off-topic for this thread, but as long as the patch touches that code we can look into this too. If VM bit all-visible is set while page is not all-visible IndexOnlyScan will show incorrect results. I observed this inconsistency few times on production. Two persistent subsystems (VM and heap) contradict each other, that's why I think this is a data corruption. Yes, we can repair the VM by assuming heap to be the source of truth in this case. But we must also emit ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED XX001 code into the logs. In many cases this will alert on-call SRE. To do so I propose to replace elog(WARNING,...) with ereport(WARNING,(errcode(ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED),..). Best regards, Andrey Borodin.