Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Alex Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>
From: Alex Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Jay Levitt <jay.levitt@gmail.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-18T10:33:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because >> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*... > > I think this is a point worth serious thought. I wonder why do people keep complaining how their bug tracker of choice sucks, instead of doing something about that. I can see a few possible factors: a) people do like to complain, and it's easier than submitting meaningful bug reports or feature requests, patches :-) b) the developers don't listen to their users, which happens far too often unfortunately c) (I had yet another idea here, but I forgot what it was :-p) d) a wild mix of the above However, this doesn't imply existing tracker software cannot be improved and more of that must be written from scratch (unless the code is cryptic and/or is written, probably poorly, in some rarely used programming language, and is unmaintainable.) Also, the reasons outlined above do not pertain only to bug tracker software somehow: any piece of software could suffer from that and I believe many of us have seen it. So maybe there's something fundamentally wrong with every existing bug tracker (e.g. they don't fix bugs for you?) Well, just kidding. ;-) -- Alex