Re: pg_execute_from_file review

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-29T17:21:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself.

For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you
want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version
of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)?

> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"?
>
> That, I like.

Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch
later tonight, now is comute time.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support