Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-29T17:21:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself. For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)? > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"? > > That, I like. Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch later tonight, now is comute time. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support