Re: recovery_connections cannot start

Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers\@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-04-27T13:10:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Treating the string "true" as a special case seems like a kludge to
> me.  Maybe a robust set of internal commands wouldn't be a kludge, but
> that's not what's being proposed here.  I guess it's just a matter of
> opinion.

I don't see how to have internal commands without having special cases
for the setting, and I did propose "pg_archive_bypass" as the name. I
guess the implementation would be what Simon was talking about, though.

I don't see "true" as meaningful in the context of an archive_command…

Regards,
-- 
dim