Re: recovery_connections cannot start
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers\@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-04-27T13:10:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Treating the string "true" as a special case seems like a kludge to > me. Maybe a robust set of internal commands wouldn't be a kludge, but > that's not what's being proposed here. I guess it's just a matter of > opinion. I don't see how to have internal commands without having special cases for the setting, and I did propose "pg_archive_bypass" as the name. I guess the implementation would be what Simon was talking about, though. I don't see "true" as meaningful in the context of an archive_command… Regards, -- dim