Re: Open 7.3 items
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
From: Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-07T15:20:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Do we have a list going of the things we want to fix in the next > protocol change? Offhand I remember > > * redesign startup packet to eliminate fixed field widths > * fix COPY protocol to allow resync after errors, support binary data > * less brain-dead protocol for fast-path function calls > * allow NOTIFY to include parameters > * richer ERROR reports (error codes, other stuff) Some kind of parameter binding or improved support for prepareable statements would require changes to the FE/BE protocol -- being able to accept parameters without passing them through the parser, for example. Allowing clients to cleanly determine the current transaction state will require FE/BE protocol changes, I think. (Or at least, that's my vague recollection of the discussion on -hackers from a couple months ago). That's all I can think of -- there's probably more stuff... Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC