Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
From: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-10-02T16:20:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: Tom> Hm. transformRuleStmt already does special-case utility statements Tom> to some extent, so my inclination would be to make it do more of Tom> that. However, it looks like that might end up with rather Tom> spaghetti-ish code, as that function is kind of messy already. Tom> Or we could abandon the notion of adding the assertion. I don't Tom> know how much work it's worth. Fixing transformRuleStmt just pushes the issue along another step: InsertRule wants to do recordDependencyOnExpr on the rule actions, which just does find_expr_references_walker. I'm going to leave the assertion out for now and put in a comment for future reference. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
Commits
-
Selectively include window frames in expression walks/mutates.
- 3473f81dd2a3 9.4.25 landed
- d2427f11b28d 9.5.20 landed
- 6db0d7f35917 9.6.16 landed
- ede0ab6ccce4 10.11 landed
- 0a445f27909a 11.6 landed
- 0b11dc01922b 12.1 landed
- b7a1c5539ad3 13.0 landed