Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>, jian he
<jian.universality@gmail.com>, Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-03-11T17:52:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add non-text output formats to pg_dumpall
- 763aaa06f034 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve pg_dump/pg_dumpall help synopses and terminology
- dec6643487bb 18.0 cited
-
Non text modes for pg_dumpall, correspondingly change pg_restore
- 1495eff7bdb0 18.0 landed
-
Doc: manually break lines in wide UUID examples.
- a6524105d20b 18.0 cited
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > Hello, > > On 2025-Mar-11, Mahendra Singh Thalor wrote: > >> In map.dat file, I tried to fix this issue by adding number of characters >> in dbname but as per code comments, as of now, we are not supporting \n\r >> in dbnames so i removed handling. >> I will do some more study to fix this issue. > > Yeah, I think this is saying that you should not consider the contents > of map.dat as a shell string. After all, you're not going to _execute_ > that file via the shell. > > Maybe for map.dat you need to escape such characters somehow, so that > they don't appear as literal newlines/carriage returns. I haven't looked at the code for this, but why are we inventing an ad-hoc file format? Why not use JSON, like we do for backup manifests? Then storing arbitrary database names won't be a problem. - ilmari