Re: Open 7.3 items
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-16T16:46:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Specifically, what is ugly about it? Is it that global users have an @ > at the end of their names? How do we prevent namespace collisions > _without_ doing this? I am all ears. The folks who are unhappy about this design basically think that the namespace collisions issue should not be considered a vital requirement; whereupon you don't have to have the '@' because a search in the pg_shadow flat file would work well enough. It comes down to a judgment call about which is uglier, putting '@' on global usernames or having to avoid namespace collisions. At this point I think we've wasted more than enough time on the argument; I haven't seen any new ideas recently, nor any change in anyone's position. Since no one seems to want to do the work to make a better implementation, I vote we accept the patch we have and move on. regards, tom lane