Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@bluetreble.com>
From: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-21T19:58:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
AFAICT in older versions only object types that absolutely had to wait for DO_POST_DATA_BOUNDARY would do so. More recently though, objects are being added after that (presumably because it's easier than renumbering everything in dbObjectTypePriority). Is this change a good or bad idea? Should there be an official guide for where new things go? -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
Commits
-
Fix pg_dump/pg_restore to emit REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW commands last.
- b93217653b68 9.4.13 landed
- 65048cf23dba 9.5.8 landed
- 3d76328298ca 9.6.4 landed
- 3eb9a5e7c4c9 10.0 landed
- 035bb82222bc 9.3.18 landed