Re: AW: The lightbulb just went on...
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>
Cc: "'Michael J Schout'" <mschout@gkg.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-10-19T14:11:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at> writes: >> SELECT session_data, id >> FROM sessions >> WHERE id = ? >> FOR UPDATE >> >> I think part of my problem might be that sessions is a view >> and not a table, > Did you create an on update do instead rule ? > This is currently not done automatically for views, > thus views without additional "create rule"s are select only. > But, I am wondering whether the "for update" places the correct lock ? Hmm, good point! I'm not sure what "select for update" on a view ought to do, but I am pretty sure that the code will not do anything useful or sensible for this case... regards, tom lane