Horton

Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

View thread
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-04-05T08:31:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
> in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
> controlled in separate two parameters?

No, sorry about confusion.  One GUC is better.  What I'm wondering is
why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support