Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-03-14T05:35:32Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes: > If someone did a naive implementation of first() and last() aggregates > for 8.1, is that something that would likely be accepted? You mean like this? CREATE FUNCTION first_accum(anyelement,anyelement) RETURNS anyelement as 'select coalesce($1,$2)' LANGUAGE SQL; CREATE AGGREGATE first (BASETYPE=anyelement, SFUNC=first_accum, STYPE = anyelement); Though I suspect it would be faster as a native C implementation. -- greg