Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches

Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> I recall having tried AOX a long time ago but I can't remember the reason
>> why I was not satisfied. I guess I can give another try by setting up a test
>> ML archive.
>
> I tried it too, before I started writing the new prototype archiver
> from scratch. I too forget why I gave up on it, but it was a strong
> enough reason for me to start coding from scratch.
>
> BTW, we only need to replace the archiver/display code. The search
> works well already.

What the current archiver looks like? A PG database containing the raw
mails and attachements? It that's the case the missing piece would be to
plug a browsing UI atop of that, right?

Regards,
-- 
dim