Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

 >> If your extension is relying on pg11+, or you have checked the pg
 >> version when constructing the makefile, you can just do:
 >> PG_CPPFLAGS += -I$(includedir_server)/extension/hstore
 >> and #include "hstore.h" will work.

 Tom> I remain of the opinion that it'd be smarter to do

 Tom> PG_CPPFLAGS += -I$(includedir_server)/extension

 Tom> then

 Tom> #include "hstore/hstore.h"

 Tom> This way requires fewer -I options and is far more robust against
 Tom> header name conflicts.

Sure, it works for the simple cases like hstore, but how does it handle
the case of a pgxs extension that installs more than one include file,
one of which includes another?

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)