Horton

Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option

Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-08T04:29:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
>>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

 >> This needs to be fixed in ruleutils, IMO, not by changing what the
 >> grammar accepts.

 Alvaro> Fair. I didn't change what the grammar accepts. I ended up only
 Alvaro> throwing an error in parse analysis when a bare NULL const is
 Alvaro> seen.

This seems far too arbitrary to me.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

Commits

  1. Support FETCH FIRST WITH TIES