Re: Why is parula failing?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, tharar@amazon.com
Date: 2024-05-13T23:29:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> I've not seen any recent failures from Parula that relate to this
> issue.  The last one seems to have been about 4 weeks ago.

> I'm now wondering if it's time to revert the debugging code added in
> 1db689715.  Does anyone think differently?

+1.  It seems like we wrote off the other issue as a compiler bug,
so I don't have much trouble assuming that this one was too.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"

  2. Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test

  3. Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables