Re: Why is parula failing?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, tharar@amazon.com
Date: 2024-05-13T23:29:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > I've not seen any recent failures from Parula that relate to this > issue. The last one seems to have been about 4 weeks ago. > I'm now wondering if it's time to revert the debugging code added in > 1db689715. Does anyone think differently? +1. It seems like we wrote off the other issue as a compiler bug, so I don't have much trouble assuming that this one was too. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"
- ec1a405adc24 17.0 landed
-
Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test
- 1db689715d44 17.0 landed
-
Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables
- a0390f6ca6c7 17.0 cited