Re: Prefered Types

Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>

From: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
To: Зотов Роман <zotov@oe-it.ru>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-05-04T12:48:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On May 4, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Зотов Роман wrote:
>>> F(smallint)
>>> F(integer)
>>> but call like F(float)
>>> i wouldn`t like to fail it.
>> I think this particular example would be a mistake, because that cast
>> would be lossy, so you want to invoke it only when the user explicitely
>> selects it.  The other way around would be fine, I think, that is,
>> F(float)
>> F(float8)
>> and the call is F(int)
> As i think i not must write function with Float, String, and many other arg when my function have INT arg... and if caller wouln`t think about types he cant use your strong types
> why it not must work like as assignment??? why implicit and assignment is different???
> I know only implicit and explicit casts and i think imlicit=asssign

I was ready to educate Зотов on why that was a bad idea until I read...

> Yes, but while you think what update table1 set IntField = FloatField is valid
> but Select FuncWithIntArg(FloatArg) is not valid
> you have no problems in current solution, because it works same :)

Sure enough, this works: UPDATE ... SET int_field = ( SELECT float_field FROM ... );

Which begs the question... why do we allow on assignment casting of a float to an int? I would think that should be explicit only...

If we are going to allow assignment casting of float to int, then I'm hard-pressed to see why we wouldn't allow you to call an int function with a float value, assuming there wasn't a more suitable cast available.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net