Thread

  1. Postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz

    maycock@intelliquest.com — 1998-03-25T17:15:58Z

    
    
    
    It appears that this patch is not exactly correct. Using patch version 2.1b
    on my slackware linux-2.0.30 kernel,
    I get the following error:
    
    Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
    The text leading up to this was:
    --------------------------
    |diff -cNr postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql
    pgsql/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql
    |*** postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql       Wed Dec 31 19:00:00
     1969
    |--- pgsql/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql        Thu Mar 12 08:09:41 1998
    --------------------------
    (Creating file postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql...)
    Patching file postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql using Plan A...
    patch: **** malformed patch at line 22987: box} {}}
    
    
    Matt
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz

    Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-03-25T20:22:48Z

    On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 maycock@intelliquest.com wrote:
    
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > It appears that this patch is not exactly correct. Using patch version 2.1b
    > on my slackware linux-2.0.30 kernel,
    > I get the following error:
    > 
    > Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
    > The text leading up to this was:
    > --------------------------
    > |diff -cNr postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql
    > pgsql/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql
    > |*** postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql       Wed Dec 31 19:00:00
    >  1969
    > |--- pgsql/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql        Thu Mar 12 08:09:41 1998
    > --------------------------
    > (Creating file postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql...)
    > Patching file postgresql-6.3/src/bin/pgaccess/formdemo.sql using Plan A...
    > patch: **** malformed patch at line 22987: box} {}}
    
    	From one other report, it appears that the line is too long for
    2.1b to handle...it was tested and works fine under FreeBSDs patch 2.1...