Horton

Re: Ltree syntax improvement

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>
Date: 2020-04-01T23:46:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> [ latest version of ltree syntax extension ]

This is going to need another rebase after all the other ltree hacking
that just got done.  However, I did include 0001 (use a switch) in
the commit I just pushed, so you don't need to worry about that.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Clean up parsing of ltree and lquery some more.